Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Dalai Lama gets 385 million more votes than Trevor Manuel

After asking 'Who is the Dalai Lama?' last week, Finance Minister Trevor Manuel has been informed that the Tibetan is in fact the spiritual leader of 400 million people, or roughly 385 million more than voted for the ANC. Manuel has also been given a set of encyclopedias to bulk up his general knowledge, which colleagues describe as "just a gaping hole".

Manuel's question, asked at a conference where he was trying to explain the semantic difference between being China's whore and being China's bitch, added more fuel to the fire of controversy surrounding South Africa's barring of the Dalai Lama.

The comment also sent shockwaves through the financial world as market observers wondered what else Manuel didn't know.

"If he has to ask who the Dalai Lama is, does he even know how to feed himself?" asked a worried Finance Ministry insider who asked not to be named as he did not want to be sent to China for re-education.

"As far as we can tell, Trevor thinks the Dalai Lama is the main character from a Broadway musical called 'Hello Dalai'.

"It is very awkward."

However the exiled Tibetan government has asked the South African public to be patient with its Finance Minister, saying that he could not help it if his general knowledge matched that of a bush of geraniums.

It said it was sending him a set of encyclopedias with 'Tibet', 'Dalai Lama' and 'human rights' dog-eared in the hope that Manuel would "one day figure out the difference between 15 million voters and 385 million believers".

Manuel's office said the minister was grateful for the gift as he had started taking strain having to formulate fiscal policy using Chappies wrappers as reference material.

According to Finance Ministry spokesman Shekels Mpundu, the controversy had put Manuel in a very uncomfortable position.

"As Finance Minister, Mr Manuel is the farm-hand who has to milk the Chinese dragon," explained Mpundu. "Basically he has to massage dragon-teats all day.

"When he comes home he's too sticky and tired to read up on world events. All he wants to do is have his dinner, watch Desperate Housewives on the PVR, phone Beijing and ask permission to go to bed, and go to bed.

"People should understand that and cut the guy some slack."

Link Dalai Lama gets 385 million more votes than Trevor Manuel

Monday, March 30, 2009

ANC meets to test how inept it can be before voters abandon it

The ANC is to start a campaign of tarring and feathering elderly people, exposing its buttocks at nuns and systematically groping citizens in an effort to gauge how recklessly it can behave before its voters start abandoning it. "We're pretty sure we can do anything and they'll still vote for us," said a spokesman. "But we just want to make sure."

The ruling party has increased its majority in almost every general election since coming to power in 1994, despite a catalogue of corruption scandals, sexual misconduct allegations, fraud, perjury, nepotism and a penchant for ill-fitting suits with shoulder pads apparently bought in Eastern Europe in the 1980s.

"The great thing about our support is that as far as we can tell it's completely unquestioning," said party spokesman Kneejerk Kunene.

"Those who doubt our policies don't fight us. They just leave to form other parties.

"Dissent is therefore literally impossible in the ANC. If you agree with us, you're in the ANC. If you don't, you're not. It's a beautiful system."

He added that since 1994 the ANC had proved that "democracy is about sidelining minorities", and that anyone who disagreed was clearly a racist.

However he said that while the ANC had taken its voters for granted since 1994, it could not always assume "blind devotion" and wanted to test how far it could go before voters began to feel uneasy.

"We can't rely on logic, because South African voters don't," he explained.

"You'd think an official government policy of denying Aids in the country with the worst infection rate in the world would be a sure-fire way of losing support. Well, I've got three little words for you, china: 70 percent majority."

Likewise, he said, the party had expected its predominantly Christian support-base to accuse it of blasphemy – or at lease staggering arrogance – in repeatedly comparing its leaders to Jesus Christ.

"Again, not a peep," said Kunene. "In fact it's proof that the meek shall inherit the earth. Or at least every province except the Western Cape."

He said initial attempts to gauge how tolerant its supporters were had gone unnoticed.

"We were certain there'd be some sort of backlash when we destroyed the Department of Home Affairs and made South African passports a liability," he said. "Nothing. Not even a cross text message."

Kunene confirmed that the new study would be undertaken by the ANC Youth League, which had volunteered for the job.

"Many of them are still veterans of the heroic uprising in 2007 when they bared their buttocks in support of Comrade Julius Malema," he said. "They say they are eager to storm the barricades of oppression once more, especially if it means they can get their pants off.

"They are very eager democrats."

Link:- http://www.hayibo.com/

SA President apologizes for shoddy quality of Dalai Lama lies

PRETORIA. South African President Kgalema Motlanthe has apologized for the shoddy quality of the lies surrounding the banning of the Dalai Lama, but has vowed to produce better lies in future. "All the really great liars were purged with Mbeki," he explained. "The public needs to understand that it will take time to develop a new cadre of world-class liars."

According to the South African government the exiled Tibetan leader was refused an entry visa to the country because his presence would draw attention away from the 2010 World Cup.

Addressing the media this morning, President Motlanthe conceded that as lies went, the latest had been one of the feeblest offerings "for some years".

"Initially we were going to say that the Dalai Lama was being refused entry because he's carrying the SARS virus," explained Motlanthe.

"We faxed the prototype lie through to Beijing, to the Commissar for African Assimilation, or as I like to call him, 'Boss', but he called back in about twenty minutes to remind us that SARS doesn't exist and that no-one has ever contracted any virus of any kind in China."

Motlanthe said that the purging of Thabo Mbeki and his allies had decimated the ANC's cadre of highly skilled liars.

"We're only now realizing just how exceptional Mbeki's liars were," said Motlanthe. "They came up with some incredible lies: a better life for all; there's no link between HIV and Aids; the elections in Zimbabwe were free and fair; South Africa is winning the war on crime; the arms deal was clean.

"When you lose people like that it takes time to fill the hole they leave behind."

He said the ANC's current cadre of liars were "raw, untested, and not yet comfortable within an intellectual milieu".

Asked if that meant they were semi-retarded, Motlanthe said he did not wish to "bandy about unkind labels" but confirmed that many were more comfortable with exposing their buttocks and calling for the murder of political opponents than they were with sitting down and writing "long complicated sentences".

Meanwhile the Congress of the People has denied that it is made up largely of Mbeki's cadre of liars.

According to COPE spokesman Minime Mbeki, nobody in the new party has ever told a lie.

"Which is why we're going to win 845 percent of the vote," added Mbeki.

"And when we're in power we're going to end poverty by buying more submarines and we're going to cure Aids with potatoes. We promise. Really. Seriously."

....And finally, how do you say, “We’ve sold our soul to the devil” in Chinese?

Sovereign SA bans Dalai Lama, will call Chinese Premier 'baas'

The South African government has defended its decision to ban Tibet's Dalai Lama from entering the country and has denied that it is slavishly obeying China. According to a spokesman, the government has made only minor concessions to Beijing....

Link http://www.hayibo.com/

SAA – sink or save?

Although our national airline, South African Airways has been a bad, bad boy this year, Santa er… government still dished out an additional R1.6-billion for the beleaguered parastatal in its 2009/10 budget.

And the giving doesn't stop there, no sir! SAA's board of directors came under heavy criticism after it was revealed that they were literally taking home the bacon. Of the R65-million net profit SAA made during its 2006/7 financial year, more than half that money (R37.64-million) was paid out in performance bonuses. Surely you actually have to perform to receive a performance bonus?

Even (recently) axed CEO, Khaya Ngqula had his piece of the pie as his earnings topped an estimated R20-million during his four-year tenure as head of the airline. It seems like a lot of taking and a lot less giving from SAA's side.

According to Public Enterprises Minister Brigitte Mabandla, our national airliner has received financial support, including cash injections, totalling more than R12.054-billion since 2004, this excluding the restructuring costs of R1.345-billion. And it is still begging for more.

Time is ripe to look into privatising

Meanwhile the parastatal's losses rallied to around R13.74-billion for the period from 2002 to 2008, while the global economic downturn, coupled with higher fuel prices and heavy interest on its crippling debt, are seen to still plague the airliner during the current financial year.

Please excuse my business ignorance, but surely a company that ran at an annual loss of around R1-billion in 2008 and R833-million in 2007 would be a lost cause? Surely the time is ripe to seriously look into privatising our money-sucking national carrier? Privatisation has been proven time and again to be a sure-fire recipe for success.

SAA has a legacy of failures. This was only aggravated by the latest drug-trafficking scandal that caused the airliner much damage – and perhaps even more ticket sales. With around five airlines flying domestic and international flights to and from South Africa, it really makes one wonder whether there is still much need for the state-owned airline.

SAA could look at a more lucrative future

Opposition political parties have on numerous occasions called on government – its biggest shareholder – to privatise SAA, but without any luck. If the privatisation of other aviation giants such as British Airways, Kenya Airways and Air Botswana is anything to go by, SAA could be looking at a more lucrative future. SAA could make a killing through listing, while other options such as BEE deals could also prove rewarding.

Of course, such a privatisation will require the business to get rid of all inept staff and the appointment of a capable and experienced CEO would be vital for survival.

The South African route is a profitable one and should SAA fold, I am certain there are many carriers, national and international which would jump at such an opportunity. Our national carrier is an albatross around South Africa's neck, an embarrassment not only to our aviation industry but also to our country.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

South Africa Honors Cuban Communist Fidel Castro

Fidel Castro Bestowed Top South African Order

HAVANA, Cuba, March 27 (acn) Fidel Castro, historic leader of the Cuban Revolution was awarded on Friday the Order of the Companions of O.R. Tambo, South Africa’s highest distinction.

South African President Kgalema Motlante handed over the order, materialized in a gold medal, to Cuban Ambassador in Pretoria, Angel Fernandez, Itar-tass news agency reported.

In announcing its initiative some days ago, the government of South Africa explained that the order was given to Fidel Castro in recognition of his friendship towards South Africa and for his key support of the struggle against the former Apartheid system, racism and colonialism in the African nation.

The Companions of O.R. Tambo order was established in 2002 by the South African government, headed by the African National Congress (ANC), to honor O.R. Tambo, former exiled leader of that organization during the apartheid era.

Other personalities who have been awarded the top South African order include Martin Luther King Jr, Salvador Allende and Mohandas Mahatma Gandhi, all posthumously.

South Africa faces turmoil over Zuma

Fraud charges set to be dropped as poll chaos looms
writes Fred Bridgland

MULTIPLE CHARGES of corruption against Jacob Zuma, who is certain to be elected South Africa's new head of state in three weeks time, are to be dropped tomorrow following an emergency meeting of the state prosecuting agency.

The decision will plunge the country into political turmoil ahead of the April 22 general election - the fourth post-apartheid poll - with suggestions in all publications that Zuma has submitted evidence that former President Thabo Mbeki received bribes in connection with the country's contentious £5.5billion arms deal with West European weapons manufacturers.

Zuma, 66, was due to go on trial in August on nearly 800 counts of corruption, fraud, racketeering, money laundering and tax evasion in connection with the arms deal, under which the country is being equipped with advanced warplanes, frigates, submarines and other equipment. British Aerospace, which is being investigated by the UK's fraud squad in connection with the deal, provided Hawk trainer jets and Gripen fighter-bombers, built in collaboration with Sweden's Saab.

Helen Zille, leader of the country's main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, said the decision by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), will set a precedent that individuals in power are "above the law and can bully their way out of trouble".

Karima Brown, political editor of Business Day, the country's leading upmarket daily, said tomorrow's NPA meeting will be tumultuous as the country's acting prosecution chief Mokotedi Mpshe shares with his staff "devastating" information presented by Zuma's lawyers which makes a prosecution "impossible".

Investigators who have spent eight years gathering information on Zuma's alleged crimes feel deeply betrayed by the impending decision, said Ms Brown, quoting an NPA source.

The reports said Zuma's lawyers had submitted tapes, presumed to be recorded by one of the competing branches of South Africa's intelligence services, showing a political conspiracy against Zuma was plotted by former president Mbeki.

Mbeki was deposed as head of state last September as the result of an internal power struggle within the ruling African National Congress (ANC).

Among a number of allegations said to be contained in the tapes

according to the daily Johannesburg Star

NPA to drop Zuma charges
'If we drop Zuma charges, NPA may reveal why'

is a devastating conversation between Mbeki and the former head of the investigations unit of the NPA, Leonard McCarthy, who recently became head of the World Bank's anti-corruption unit on Mbeki's recommendation.

The timing of the announcement of tomorrow's NPA decision will be crucial, given the impending election and the fact that it is likely to be the closest run since Nelson Mandela became South Africa's first black head of state in 1994.

Political commentators in several publications will have to give detailed reasons for dropping of charges against Zuma, who was said to have received hundreds of bribes connected to the arms deal from financier Schabir Shaik, who was imprisoned for 15 years in 2005 on corruption charges but paroled for "health" reasons last month.

Zuma's battle with the state has dominated the political landscape in South Africa for several years. His victory will raise serious questions about the independence of the prosecuting authorities and other branches of the legal system.

The looming controversy over the dropping of charges against Zuma comes as a debate rages over the ANC government's ban on the Dalai Lama attending a peace conference in Johannesburg last Friday designed to promote next year's World Cup Finals, being hosted by South Africa.

The peace conference was cancelled after the Dalai Lama's fellow Nobel peace laureates Nelson Mandela, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and former president FW de Klerk refused to attend after learning of the Tibetan spiritual leader's ban. The Dalai Lama was banned from attending after protests from Beijing and alleged payments by the Chinese government into the ANC's election coffers.

Finance minister Trevor Manuel justified the ban, saying: "Who is the Dalai Lama? I've heard him described as a God and Buddha. To say anything against him is, in some quarters, equivalent to trying to shoot Bambi." Manuel is expected to be the country's next vice president.

Archbishop Tutu, who was at the forefront of the anti-apartheid movement, said the ANC government had "lost the plot" with the ban, adding that the world's press were "saying we are dirt."

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Is the ANC selling out our sovereignty?

....How do you say, “We’ve sold our soul to the devil” in Chinese?

Sovereign SA bans Dalai Lama, will call Chinese Premier 'baas'

The South African government has defended its decision to ban Tibet's Dalai Lama from entering the country and has denied that it is slavishly obeying China. According to a spokesman, the government has made only minor concessions to Beijing.... See link for full story http://www.hayibo.com/

James Myburgh, editor of politicsweb.co.za, on the dangers of the ANC using foreign funding to buy its way to a two-thirds majority

The Chinese Communist Party is helping to pay for the ANC's 2009 election campaign.

For some time now it has been clear that the African National Congress has been running the best election campaign that money can buy. Compared to the other political parties, which have had to scrape together funds to contest the elections, South Africa's ruling party seems to have an almost bottomless war chest.

Some of the sources of the ANC's advantages in fundraising are known. The ANC, due to the current size of its parliamentary majority, receives some seventy percent of government funding - although it is not allowed to spend this on electioneering per se. Most corporate funders allocate the bulk of their political party funding to the ANC, although opposition parties receive a greater or lesser share as well.

The ANC has also, over the years, pursued various surreptitious funding schemes which may or may not have borne fruit in this election. Yet it seems that much of the ANC's massive, and possibly overwhelming, expenditure on this election campaign originates from foreign sources. On Friday the Mail & Guardian quoted "party insiders" as saying the ANC's election effort has been "heavily subsidised by the ruling parties in Libya, Angola, China and India." It has also apparently received funds from Equatorial Guinea.

This report seems to have been little noticed, which is surprising as this kind of funding poses as much, if not more of, a threat to South Africa's democracy than the efforts to subvert the National Prosecuting Authority. There are self-evident problems with this kind of funding. For one thing, for the ANC to actively solicit such donations obviously compromises South Africa's national security (defined as the continued ability of the country "to pursue the development of its internal life without serious interference ... from foreign powers.") For another, it poses clear dangers for the consolidation of democracy in this country.

It is for such reasons that many democracies ban foreign donations outright. In the United States - according to a Federal Electoral Commission brochure - the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) "prohibits any foreign national from contributing, donating or spending funds in connection with any federal, state, or local election in the United States, either directly or indirectly. It is also unlawful to help foreign nationals violate that ban or to solicit, receive or accept contributions or donations from them. Persons who knowingly and willfully engage in these activities may be subject to fines and/or imprisonment."

Such prohibitions apply in many other countries as well. In 2003 the Stockholm-based International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) produced a useful handbook on political party funding across the world (see here). It states that foreign donations to political parties were banned in forty out of the 111 countries surveyed. Among the countries where ANC-style foreign fundraising would be illegal were: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, the Dominican Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Honduras, Iceland, Japan, Latvia, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Senegal, Thailand, and the United Kingdom.

The IDEA handbook notes that foreign funding of political parties presents the most "obvious danger" of all sources of party funding: "If a governing party depends heavily on financial resources provided by foreign governments or especially multinational corporations, their influence may undermine national sovereignty and the democratic principle of self-determination."

The ANC's 1994 and 1999 election campaigns were largely financed with donations from foreign countries, including some of the world's most notorious dictatorships. One result has been the serial neglect by the ANC government of South Africa's national interests in foreign policy (not to mention human rights considerations) as its first priority has always been to repay its main funders with favours. At various points over the past fifteen years the ANC has been in hock to the regimes of Nigeria, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Libya, China, and Taiwan (see here). And these are just the ones we know about.

Foreign funding seems to have dried up before the 2004 poll after Nelson Mandela stopped tapping foreign leaders on the ANC's behalf following his fallout with Thabo Mbeki. But, according to the Mail & Guardian ANC President Jacob Zuma has now successfully used his visits to various fraternal ruling parties overseas to do some fund raising on the side. This may already be compromising the ability of South Africa to pursue its own interests, free of external interference. If the M&G and COPE are correct - and the Chinese Communist Party is helping to pay for the ANC's 2009 election campaign - the obvious question is whether this underpinned the government's otherwise inexplicable decision to refuse the Dalai Lama a visa to attend a conference in this country?


In its section on party funding in Africa the IDEA handbook notes that those sources of funding most incompatible with democracy are "kickbacks from recipients of government contracts and other largesse, diverting state resources to the governing party through front organizations, and donations from foreign sources such as business owners, multinationals and governments." In addition in many African countries "the use and abuse of state resources is a corrupt form of massive public funding... available only to the governing party."

The advantages that can accrue to ruling parties are a major contributing factor to democratic atrophy in Africa. As IDEA notes: "In many African countries Governing parties' use of state resources, with evident impunity, and their brazen demand for and acceptance of kickbacks explain much of the apparent electoral impregnability of many African governing parties, even those with clear records of economic and human rights failures. They manage to build such formidable electoral war chests that their impoverished opponents usually have little chance."

Apart from donations from foreign sources, there is already much evidence in the public domain of the ANC using these other dubious means to advantage itself and secure its position. The dangers for democracy in South Africa are also similar. At a time when this country should be looking forward to a more pluralistic and responsive democracy - and the ruling party to a much reduced majority - the ANC may succeed in simply buying its way back to a two-thirds majority.

ANC's dodgy funders

The ANC is keeping mum on its funding sources for the election campaign, but party insiders involved in fundraising say its election effort is heavily subsidised by the ruling parties in Libya, Angola, China and India.

A source involved in fundraising said the party began actively fund-raising in these countries for its election coffers before Polokwane. The ANC's initial election budget for the 2009 election totalled about R100-million, excluding travel and logistical arrangements, which cost the most, a source said.

He said the party has also received funds from oil-rich Equatorial Guinea, one of Africa's most notorious dictatorships.

The ANC's funding strategy is based on donations by individuals, but the big money comes from ruling parties elsewhere.

ANC president Jacob Zuma and ANC delegations have been travelling, ostensibly to build historical relationships with other ruling parties but also to raise funds, insiders say.

He visited Angola in March last year for the celebration of the battle of Cuito Cuanavale with a heavyweight ANC delegation.

In June last year, in New Delhi, he signed a memorandum of understanding between the ANC and the Indian National Congress. This was followed by a visit to China where he met Hu Jintao, Chinese president and general secretary of the Communist Party of China.

In October last year he attended Equatorial Guinea's independence day celebrations as a guest of dictator Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, who has ruled the country since 1979, despite flawed elections.

"The ANC have never asked for money from foreign governments; it is always from one ruling party to another," said an ANC insider.

Friday, March 27, 2009

Durban top cop faces corruption probe

One of Durban's most senior Metro Police officers is to be investigated for a series of alleged transgressions, including nepotism and fraud.

He is also being chauffeured across the city by two unofficial bodyguards. Part of the complaint against him is that Metro policemen are not allowed to be used as bodyguards.

Allegations of procurement, car allowance fraud and the employment of several members of the policeman's family by Metro Police are to be being investigated by the city.

The office of the Ombudsman has been asked to probe the policeman after the compilation of a 200-page dossier by "concerned people, both within and outside the force".

The policeman involved told the Daily News that the allegations were false and said that people inside and outside the department had a vendetta against him.

He confirmed that investigators from the office of the Ombudsman had contacted him regarding the allegations and he had submitted statements in his defence.

With regards to allegations of nepotism, he said: "My daughter works in the control room which is a separate department. She was called for an interview and accepted after the normal interview process. I had no jurisdiction over that," he said.

The bulky dossier, which the Daily News has a copy of, consists of more than 200 pages of procurement documents, car logs and phone calls, all part of the alleged evidence against the policeman.

Among the documents are 18 pages of procurement information detailing dozens of repairs done to official police vehicles - by a tool hire company. Allegedly authorised by the policeman, the company ostensibly repaired ball joints, clutches, electronic equipment and gearboxes.

Misfires, shock absorbers and oil leaks were also among the items repaired by the company, which has since closed its doors.

Although the company had been issued an official municipal supplier number, authors of the dossier question why a tool hire company would be allowed to work on emergency vehicles often used in dangerous situations. The company had no Retail Motor Industry, or other automotive repair, accreditation, it is claimed.

"The nature of duty performed by police officers is of high speed chases, rapid response and is also needed to get an officer away from danger very quickly," reads the covering letter by the dossier's compilers to the ombudsman. "How do we know that during that period all the department accidents were not as a result of the inferior workmanship?"

A forensic audit into the use of a municipal vehicle by two Metro Police constables, who have acted as unofficial bodyguards and drivers to the senior policeman, has also been called for.

Instead of being out on the beat in the crime prevention and warrants section, the constables have instead been chauffeuring him to and from work in an official vehicle, while he continues to claim a car allowance for his private vehicle.

Details of his movements in the official Metro Police vehicle are extensively detailed in more than 100 pages of reports generated by C Track, which tracks all police vehicles across the city.

On the issue of his personal drivers, the dossier said: "They are also always in civilian clothing and work exorbitant hours of overtime. They have also been given responsibility allowances illegally as the allowances were never advertised nor published in council circulars. Nobody knows what overtime has been or is being worked by these members as everything is authorised by the policeman himself."

Mystery white foam pollutes river

Banks of snow white foam accumulated in and around a section of the Sandspruit in Katherine Street, Sandton, on Wednesday.

The foam appeared to be soap suds from some kind of detergent, and had built up into towering walls - about 1.5m in height - particularly around fast-flowing water.

The foam appeared to be coming from a stormwater drain that feeds into the river, but there was too much of it to be certain.

According to The Star photographer Antoine de Ras, who had been at the same site a few weeks ago, there was a notable absence of wildlife.

On the last occasion he had seen ducks and kingfishers, but the only birds there on Wednesday were two hadedas.

Joburg Water spokesperson Baldwin Matsimela said there had been complaints about nearby factories in Wynberg dumping contaminants into the Sandspruit.

Wetlands and riparian expert Paul Fairall said the culprit was a washing powder factory in Wynberg.

He said the factory was regularly washing out its solphonic acid tanks into stormwater drains that filter into the Sandspruit.

Solphonic agent is the foaming agent of washing powders.

"It will kill any kind of living organism - in that concentration it has a horrible effect.

"What worries me is that it happens on a regular basis and it's never addressed," said Fairall.

CSIR research group leader in ecosystems and human health, Dr Paul Oberholster, said that if the contaminant was from a detergent it would change the chemical structure of the water by either raising or lowering the pH.

This would affect the entire food chain - birds, fish, microvertebrates, and phytoplankton (algae) - because some species have a certain ph tolerance.

Detergents also contain a lot of phosphate.

This encourages the growth of blue-green algae, which can be toxic, and is responsible for problems currently being experienced at Hartbeespoort Dam.

China funding ANC campaign?

The government's refusal to grant the Dalai Lama a visa highlights the need for the regulation of political party funding, political analyst Judith February said on Thursday.

"We just had the situation with the Dalai Lama, so I think it is reasonable to ask whether the ANC received funding from the Chinese recently to fund its election campaign," February, an analyst for the Institute for Democracy in South Africa (Idasa), told the Cape Town Press Club.

The Dalai Lama was refused a visa to attend a 2010 World Cup peace conference to have been held in Johannesburg starting on Friday.

The event was cancelled after Nobel peace laureates FW De Klerk and Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu withdrew in solidarity with the Dalai Lama.

Shrouded in secrecy

"The whole process of party funding is shrouded in secrecy," February said.

"There are no regulations of private funding to political parties. This is a big gap in our anti-corruption apparatus. It needs to be fixed sooner rather than later."

Idasa took five political parties to the Cape High Court in 2005 to get them to reveal their funding.

The organisation was unsuccessful in its application, with the judge ruling that political parties were private bodies which did not have to make their books public.

Issues with funding

She said all political parties had had issues with funding, including the ANC, DA and Independent Democrats.

"I think most political parties agree on a situation of 'show yours and I'll show you mine'," she said.

February said it was worrying that Parliament had shown no movement on the issue, despite the ANC taking a resolution at its conference in Polokwane in 2007 calling for transparency on contributions to parties.

February also spoke on the upcoming April 22 elections.

ANC could be hurt in polls

She said there was a good chance that the ANC might be hurt in the polls after the way in which it handled corruption charges against party president Jacob Zuma.

"I think that the ANC is in danger of losing the two-thirds majority in Parliament," she said.

"Some of the pressure to drop the charges against Zuma might hurt them at the polls," she said.

"The ANC needs to be very careful in the way it deals with this issue."

February said she expected the DA to "do very well" in the Western Cape and the ANC had itself to blame for losing support in the province.

"The party did not do a good job in running the city," she said.

"I think that in Helen Zille people see a leader of integrity. The city of Cape Town has had no corruption scandals. That sticks with people."

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

South Africa's black taxis history of violence and outrageous death toll...

The fact that the taxi industry has opted for violence and intimidation is not surprising. The industry is known for its history of violence. Scores of people are killed each time there is a taxi war. These wars occur frequently, all over the country.

1990s: More that 2000 people died as a result of taxi-related violence in the 90s. There was an ongoing war between the two taxi rivals Cata and Codeta. Over time, it became apparent that some of the Cata drivers were also gangsters, who were using the taxi industry as a smoke-screen for gang and drug-related warfare. According to Human Rights Commission some of the coloured taxi associations have solicited the "protection" of some of the Cape Flats most feared gang-lords.

2000: Golden Arrow buses were targeted by unknown snipers. The taxi industry demanded that Golden Arrow increase its fares and withdraw from the Khayelitsha area over weekends. There were rumours that the sniper gang was hired by taxi operators. The confrontation lasted for 15 weeks and five people were killed.

2005: Violence broke out again, when the two main taxi rivals fought for rights to transport passengers to the R600-million Cape Gate Mall in Kraaifontein. Both sides wanted to monopolise the route.
Deaths: Seven drivers and 15 passengers were killed
Injured: Scores of people were injured, including a police officer

Former premier Ebrahim Rassol constituted an inquiry into the taxi violence in the Western Cape. The inquiry was aimed at building a lasting base for an empowered industry, safety for commuters, peace among associations and respect for the rule of law.


Taxi violence broke out again during the inquiry. A man was shot and killed by unknown gunmen. No one was willing to talk about the the killings. Perpetrators are rarely arrested because people refuse to come forward with information. The inquiry failed to solve the problems and the violence continued. A similar inquiry was established in Johannesburg and KwaZulu-Natal but nothing came of it.

2006: Taxi violence claimed 25 lives in Khayelitsha.
Reason: Fighting over the Bellville interchange — Codeta wanted to take passengers up to the mall but their rivals were against it.

2007: Six taxi drivers were killed in separate incidents. They were still fighting over taxi routes. Both sides blamed each other for the violence.

Mounting death toll

According to a study by Automobile Association of South Africa, up to 70 000 minibus taxi crash each year — double the number of accidents involving other motor vehicles.

  • In 2008 there were 58 490 unroadworthy or unlicensed minibus taxis.
  • Taxi operators break every road rule that exists.
  • Taxi operators use foul language when dealing with their commuters.
  • Taxi are involved in approximately 1380 fatal crashes annually.
  • Many taxi drivers do not have driving licences or operating licences.

Cope's Western Cape premier candidate Allan Boesak recently accused Helen Zille of using apartheid tactics when she threatened to deploy the army to quell the taxi violence. But we no longer live under an apartheid regime and the rules of engagement have changed considerably. Resorting to violent intimidation when you don't get your own way is not acceptable in a democracy.

At what point will the government take strong action against these pioneers of black economic empowerment? Should law-abiding citizens suffer because we do not want to apply measures that are reminiscent of the past? The government needs to do whatever it takes to root out criminals who are hindering our country's progress and threatening the lives of innocent civilians.

Meet the doctors who freed Shaik

A psychiatrist who believed Schabir Shaik was suicidal, a former nurse turned GP and a consultant cardiologist are the three doctors whose "collective submission" helped free Schabir Shaik on medical parole.

The Star can disclose after a two-week investigation that the Durban-Westville Parole Board held meetings with Professor AE Gangat and Dr Ngenisile Mbanjwa on February 26, and with Dr Sajidah Khan on March 1.



Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, one of Africa's most prestigious hospitals. Unlike other Durban hospitals, it's situated in a park-like landscape, with no dense population close up. On the premises are in addition to the hospital, car parking, houses and apartment buildings for medical staff, 2 tennis courts, a pool, and a common braai (=barbeque) area.

The doctors recommended parole on medical grounds, according to a parole board report. At least 14 medical practitioners are understood to have treated or diagnosed Shaik since he was jailed for corruption and fraud in November, 2006, but Gangat, Mbanjwa and Khan were those involved in the last interaction with the board.

The Health Professions Council of SA is investigating whether a host of Shaik doctors should face charges of professional misconduct.

A legal report has already been submitted to a committee of preliminary inquiry, which is scheduled to meet next week.

It will decide whether there is prima facie evidence to warrant a formal inquiry against any of those involved. Any finding of misconduct could form the basis for Correctional Services boss Ngconde Balfour to send the Shaik parole decision for review by Judge Siraj Desai's parole review board.

The Star confirmed that the board that granted Shaik's medical parole comprised its vice-chairman, BD Tshabangu, and its secretary, S Tshaka - both of Correctional Services. It also includes two community members, identified as RV Ntombela and TE Mbambo.

Having studied the medical reports and held meetings with the three doctors, they also visited Shaik at the Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital on March 2.

Later that day they granted medical parole.

Gangat is the Durban psychiatrist who in February, 2007, warned Correctional Services that Shaik was "a severe suicide risk".

Shaik, who had been jailed four months earlier, was admitted to the private St Augustine's Hospital and spent 80 days there.

Gangat is also the person Balfour referred to when he said that one of the three doctors "even went as far as saying that his condition has reached an irreversible condition".

In his report to the board, Gangat was emphatic about medial parole for his patient.

"Mr Shaik is terminally ill with life-threatening organ failure due to malignant hypertension as delineated. I strongly recommend it."

Khan's report is less clear, but Balfour said in a statement on March 4 that the three medical practitioners' "collective submission" to the parole board was unanimous that Shaik was in "the final phase of his terminal condition".

The board's report states that Mbanjwa was the one who compiled a summary of all the reports from various doctors/ specialists over the years.

She was also a member of the department's regional task team, and agreed Shaik should be medically paroled. Mbanjwa, a former nurse, graduated in June, 2005, with a Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery from the University of Limpopo.

She registered as a general practitioner in January, 2007, and works for Correctional Services. Khan is described in the board's report as Shaik's consultant cardiologist "in charge of other doctors" at the Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital.

She co-signed a September, 2008, report with D P Naidoo that Shaik should be considered for medical parole. (Click on images above to enlarge)

However, their lawyer, Altus van Rensburg, confirmed at the weekend that they had not done so because Shaik was in the last phase of a terminal condition.

Their report merely indicated he could not be kept indefinitely in their hospital, and given that "prison authorities were reluctant to manage him at the prison hospital, where conditions are suboptimal", he should be considered for medical parole.

While Naidoo believed Shaik was well enough to be discharged from the hospital in November, this was resisted by the hospital management under departmental orders.
Meanwhile, a flurry of doctors' reports preceded Shaik's original application for medical parole on December 2 last year.

This included a report by a Dr R Maharaj, who in November last year described Shaik's prognosis as "poor", and stated that "he needs to go home".

The board did not approve parole then, but said that if Shaik's condition deteriorated he could apply again in the new year.

On February 17 this year, KZN Acting Regional Commissioner Mnikelwa Nxele directed that Shaik's parole application must be processed.

A parole profile report generated by the department's case management committee, together with a recommendation, was forwarded to the parole board on February 28.

This set in motion the meetings with the doctors concerned, and a sitting of the parole board on March 2 that resulted in Shaik's release a day later.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Where are the Crime Stats for South Africa?

South Africans are in the dark about the crime situation in the country. The last national crime statistics the government made public are a year old and are no longer a reflection of the status quo.

It was expected that the government would release a biannual crime report in November or December last year, but failed to do so.

Memos sent to the government requesting up-to-date crime figures have met with no response and now some researchers and experts working for crime prevention organisations believe the government is deliberately with-holding the latest data on crime until after the elections. (after Confederations Cup? and/or 2010 Fifa World Cup?)

The last national crime statistics were released to the public in June 2008 and they only contained data dating up to March 2008.

"This means that the information that we have now is a year old," said Johan Burger, a senior researcher for the crime, justice and politics programme at the Institute for Security Studies.

It was expected that the government would release the latest crime statistics in November or December 2008 as per its commitment to deliver biannual crime reports. But no national report has to date been released.

Burger is unsure that the government will even release its annual crime report in June this year.

"Perhaps we shouldn't judge too early, perhaps they are simply reviewing their crime stats release policy. They do need to reconsider it, but in the meantime we have no idea what is going on in the country," said Burger.

He suggested that it was "very plausible that the latest crime stats might contain bad news" that the government was loathe to release before the elections.

Several attempts made by Weekend Argus to contact the minister of safety and security, Nathi Mthethwa, for comment were unsuccessful.

The South African Police Service's (SAPS) crime statistician, Commissioner Chris de Kok, said he was unable to comment without Mthethwa's consent.

Should the government once again release national crime statistics for 2008/2009 in June this year, the existing data would be 15 months old. Without up-to-date crime statistics, Burger said there was no way of gauging the full extent of the crime situation in the country.

"We have no idea what is happening. We are completely in the dark," he said.

Since 2001, official policy dictated that crime statistics would only be released with the publication of the SAPS annual report in September.

Researchers and crime prevention agencies have put pressure on the government to release crime figures before to the annual report. There was also a call for more frequent reports.

In a public appeal to the government, David Bruce, a senior researcher in the Criminal Justice Programme at the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, made comparisons between other countries that struggled with high crime rates, such as Northern Ireland, which published six statistical reports a year, and the US, where the New York Police Department releases weekly statistics.

In 2007, former minister of safety and security Charles Nqakula released the national crime statistics three months ahead of schedule and made a commitment to release the national crime figures and trends every six months.

However, since Mthethwa's appointment in October last year, the release of national crime statistics have not been forthcoming.

"We saw the response by the former minister of safety and security as a step in the right direction. We suspect that the mid-term changes in the department of safety and security - the change in ministers - resulted in this commitment not being followed," said Siphiwe Nzimande, the chief executive officer of Business Against Crime South Africa (Bacsa).

Bacsa chairperson, Mark Lamberti and Nzimande submitted a proposal in a memo which was discussed with Mthethwa on November 3, 2008, in which they requested that the government release up-to-date crime statistics and more frequent reports, according to Nzimande.

"Further to this, a call was made by the chairman of Bacsa (Lamberti) in his keynote address at the National Crime Summit that took place on December 1-2, 2008. This summit was arranged by the ministry of safety and security at the specific request of the new minister and it was attended by three JCPS (Justice, Crime Prevention and Security Cluster) ministers," said Nzimande.

During Lamberti's address, he suggested that the two most critical steps in dealing with crime were to "acknowledge the problem and measure the problem".

"The current annual publication of results, sometimes as late as 18 months after their occurrence, does little to assist the fight against crime, and we believe that the nation at large and all involved in fight against crime would be encouraged and motivated by the quarterly publication of crime statistics and other key measures of the efficiency of the criminal justice system," he said.

In the absence of the most up-to-date official data on crime, Bacsa sourced information directly from the SAPS, business organisations and other crime prevention partners.

"So, while Bacsa feel that they have sufficient information to remain operational, they suggest that the non-existence of crime statistics has a negative impact on businesses in the country," Nzimande said. "The failure to regularly release the national crime statistics denies business (big and small) the opportunity to properly assess opportunities for business developments, fixed investments and to develop confidence in the government".

He said releasing biannual national crime reports were insufficient.

"The position of Bacsa has been consistent in our call for the national crime statistics, together with the performance of the entire CJS (Criminal Justice System) to be ideally released frequently - at least quarterly," he said.

Cape Town 2nd Most Violent City in the World

The ANC government had mastered delivering lower crime statistics, but remained amateur when it came to protecting the country's people, Cope Western Cape premier candidate, Alan Boesak said on Sunday.

"Crime has installed itself into the soul of [our] country... it has been coming at us with such regularity that all of us, on occasion, become immune to bad news," Boesak said.

Boesak said reported robberies with aggravating circumstances may have declined by 7.4 percent, but by 2004 there had already been an increase of almost 58 000 reported cases since the 1994 elections.

And while common assault declined by 6.6 percent last year, statistics had rocketed since 1994, with more than 61 000 incidents annually.

Indecent assaults had also more than doubled in the decade between 1994 and 2004, so a 2.1 percent decline in 2008 "was pretty meaningless when measured this way".

"Last year, Cape Town was awarded the dubious honour of ranking second in the United States foreign policy ranking of the top five murder capitals of the world," said Boesak.

"The only city more violent than Cape Town is Caracas in Venezuela. It is a disgrace."

He said Cape Town reported a murder rate of 62 persons per 100 000. With approximately 3.5 million people, that equated to almost six people violently dying in Cape Town daily.

South Africa 'unleaded' petrol still toxic - report

South African petrol remains almost as dirty and poisonous as ever, despite the introduction of "clean" unleaded petrol over the past few years.

This is the main conclusion of a report sponsored by the Netherlands Institute for South Africa and an environmental watchdog body in KwaZulu-Natal.

Although recent laboratory test samples suggest that most petrol companies are complying with the government's new fuel specifications, the report says the public is still being exposed to a toxic cocktail of heavy-metal additives and other compounds which have the potential to poison the brains and other organs of children and adults.

For example, South African petrol still contains up to five times more cancer-causing benzene than petrol in Europe and parts of the United States. South Africa has also failed to set any legal safety limit on the amount of benzene pumped into the air from car exhausts and other industrial processes.

The World Health Organisation recognises benzene as a powerful cancer-causing agent after several medical studies proved that it caused blood cancer, even at relatively low levels of exposure.

Several samples of South African fuel also contain manganese, a metal additive which has been linked to brain damage and learning disabilities, depending on the quantity and the length of time people breathe it in.

Manganese is the same metal which led to several recent cases of severe tremors and debilitating sickness among factory workers at the Assmang smelter in Cato Ridge and the Samancor plant in Meyerton.

Mixed into certain brands of local fuel under the trade name "MMT", the manganese additive acts as an octane-boosting replacement for lead, which was banned finally from SA's fuel last year because of the high levels of lead poison in the blood of numerous children.

In a report published in Durban this week, the Netherlands Institute and the South Durban Community Environmental Alliance (SDCEA) released chemical analysis reports on eight samples of unleaded and lead-replacement petrol collected from Shell, BP, Engen and Caltex garages.

All the test samples were analysed at an Engen-appointed laboratory. The report reveals that just before the final ban on leaded fuels took effect last June, the government considerably watered-down its proposed "cleaner fuels" laws following complaints from some oil refineries which argued they could not meet the new standards.

For example, the permissible level of residual lead in lead-free petrol was doubled, the percentage of benzene was increased from 3 percent to 5 percent and the permissible level of manganese was doubled from 18mg/l to 36 mg/l.

While the report welcomes the removal of lead from petrol, it argues that the replacement fuels marketed as "clean fuels" to the motoring public "may prove to be as dangerous, toxic and problematic for human health and the environment".

Engen's Willem Oosthuizen disputed this: "The new fuel is cleaner... The second phase of this process aims to get us to a situation where our fuel is as good as Europe and other parts of the world. At the moment, we are somewhere in the middle...

Cholera found in Jo'burg River


An independent water sample taken from the Jukskei River has revealed the presence of cholera but the Department of Water Affairs has yet to confirm the presence of the waterborne disease.

Paul Fairall, an environmental consultant and the chairman of the Jukskei River catchment area management forum, received the results last week of two samples he had drawn from the river.

One of the samples, taken from the Dewetshof area, below Bezuidenhout Valley, showed signs of a strain of cholera. The second sample, taken from the Jukskei in Marlboro, was clear.

Fairall said it was "the result of a tragic situation where you have thousands of refugees living in the centre of Johannesburg".

On Monday the department said it had not found cholera in the Jukskei but it would begin testing for the disease.

"With all the faecal pollution found in the Jukskei it is likely that cholera could be detected," said Leonardo Manus, manager of drinking water quality regulation at the department.

He said regional staff would need to highlight to communities most at risk to cholera the dangers of drinking untreated water.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Crime costing SA victims billions

South Africa has notoriously high rates of violent crime. Over 50 people are murdered each day in the country, often during robberies. Another 50 a day are the victims of attempts on their lives.

In case, you have forgotten about crime in Jo'burg, go here to read the latest crime statistics for Gauteng.

The four highest earning crimes in South Africa are costing victims an estimate of R110,5-billion a year, an expert at the Institute for Security Studies said on Tuesday.

Speaking at the Annual Border Management Conference, Charles Goredema, program head of the organised crime and money laundering program at the ISS, said the four crimes in SA which contributed the most toward criminal activity were drug trafficking, smuggling, financial and predatory crime.

He estimated that financial crimes "earned" the most with total gains of R80-billion to R90-billion a year, drug trafficking and smuggling of goods about R10-billion each while predatory crimes such as robbery, house breaking and theft cost victims about R500-million a year.

"It's not an academic calculation, that's just a rough estimate," Goredema said.

Using the latest SA Police Service crime figures, he took the average of the highest and the smallest amount of money gained by criminals in a specific category of crime and multiplied the amounts by the number of crimes during the year.

"In 2009 I will make a much more detailed calculation because I will get the actual figures," he said
.


Aids killing African politicians

Aids is killing so many politicians in southern Africa that their deaths are threatening the ability of governments to function properly, a researcher said on Tuesday.

Kondwani Chirambo, the lead author of a new study on deaths among local councillors in South Africa, told AFP he had studied six other countries where unnatural numbers of deaths of lawmakers could be attributed to Aids.

"If you look at the statistics, MPs have been dying relatively young and dying in large numbers. These trends are not dissimilar from the general population," said Chirambo, of the Institute for Democracy in South Africa.

Over the last eight years, South Africa has seen nearly half of its elected local councillors dying before the age of 50.

Chirambo said this "does not bode well" for South Africa, where the poor government services are a major public complaint.

In the whole of southern Africa, the study found only one elected official who openly disclosed her HIV status, and Chirambo attributes the failure of these officials to seek help to a fear of stigma.

"It is not a very healthy profile. Councillors are not the poorest people in the world," he said.

"It is clear a great deal of them feel to disclose your status is a form of political suicide."

South Africa has one of the world's highest Aids prevalence, with 5.4 million people affected. Eighteen percent of them are in the work force.

According to Chirambo, 2.6 million registered voters have died since 1999, the majority of them still young.

In Senegal, with a national Aids prevalence of one percent, there were only three vacancies in parliament caused by death of the politician.

By comparison in Zambia, where the first Aids case was noted in 1995, death is the most common cause for parliamentary vacancies.

Monday, March 16, 2009

The Left's Dream?

Jeffery Folks at American Thinker, gives us an inside look at what America could be in for, if O' Holy One get's his way.

My Socialist Past

By Jeffrey Folks

"Socialism, a luxury of the wealthy. To the poor, a suicidal creed ..."


--David Hare, A Map of the World

Anyone who has lived inside the demoralized, unproductive, gray prison of a communist state, as I did in the mid-1980s, knows to what depths of impoverishment the egalitarian fantasies of socialism inevitably lead. They lead to decades of frustrated poverty and lifetimes of untreated illness culminating in early death. I remember the columns of death notices for men and women in their forties and fifties that appeared in the local newspaper. Gradually I learned to associate those death notices with the lack of fresh foodstuffs, the travesty of state health care, and the pervasive demoralization of an enslaved population drowning itself in cheap alcohol and cigarettes.

Gradually I came to understand that the condition of life under communism, so filled with repression, suspicion, and hopelessness, dragged one down into an early grave. Gradually I saw that within the communist state everyone-everyone except the leadership of course-subsists in a cage of gnawing bitterness and permanent defeatism.

Unnumbered lives were sacrificed on the ungodly altar of communism in the last century, not only in my temporary abode of Yugoslavia but throughout eastern Europe, Russia, and much of Asia, Africa, and South America, and now the American Left wishes to revive this monstrous ideology on our own shores. Every totalitarian regime begins with the same heartfelt promises of justice and equality, just those promises of fairness that Barack Obama has made the fixation of his political career. What tyrant, one might ask, has not risen to power on promises of benevolent change?

Soon, however, those who come to power, even with good intentions, discover that for all men to be made equal, some men must be made poor, and most men will not agree to be made poor in the absence of force. So force must be applied, assets must be seized, censorship must be imposed, dissidents must be jailed, enemies must be destroyed. Men must be made equal by any means necessary, and soon enough those means include intimidation, imprisonment, and execution.

Again and again, the handsome smile of the reformer is twisted into the callous sneer of the tyrant. Those who present themselves as saviors are always the most dangerous, for unlike the one true savior, who rendered unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, they must work their will on the things of this world, and one cannot remake the world without the application of force.


Please go here to read the rest of this very informative article.

Get used to a corrupt and chaotic South Africa. But don't write it off


As long as the opposition is strong enough, this great democracy can defy the moral contamination of a President Zuma

South Africa is steeling itself for the most important election in the brief history of its democracy, taking place next month. With the euphoria of majority rule evaporating, will it go the dreary way towards formal one-party rule, or might it emerge as the one stable and truly constitutional big-state democracy in Africa? The question is wholly open.

As I basked in the epic view of Table Mountain, with the sun sinking gently across the world's most gloriously sited city, I could not resist the old Afrikaner cliche that this was God's own country. "Yes," replied a friend wearily, "and He is about to give us a criminal and a rapist as president. Big deal."

There is no doubt that Jacob Zuma, leader of the ruling African National Congress, will emerge next month as president of South Africa. Despite scandals, divisions, corruption and skulduggery, the ANC enjoys overwhelming voter support. After ejecting Thabo Mbeki as president last year and setting off a deep party split, Zuma has a firm hold on his party, and thus on power. South Africa will be spared the ignominy of the election fiascos in Kenya and Zimbabwe.

That is just a beginning. Zuma still faces plausible charges of bribery over a $5bn arms deal before the South African high court, which, despite his every effort of diversion and delay, have not gone away.

The chief prosecutor has been sacked and Zuma's former partner, Schabir Shaik, has been "compassionately" released from imprisonment for his (undenied) part in the deal. Zuma's hope is that, once in office, he can protect himself. But that, in turn, may require him to maintain his party's two-thirds parliamentary majority for constitutional change. That in turn could start the dismembering of South Africa's tentative safeguards on political and civil rights.

At this point, raw politics comes into play. What can curb Zuma? A splinter group from the ANC, known as Cope (Congress of the People) has just appointed an ordained minister as its leader, to emphasise the need to cleanse politics of ANC sleaze. Cope is already scoring some 15% of the non-white vote. To this would be allied the Natal-based Inkatha Freedom party, firmly in opposition to the ANC.

The former white progressives - now the Democratic Alliance under Cape Town's dynamic mayor, Helen Zille - seem likely to win the Western Cape provincial assembly, but their desperate ambition is to hold on to about 12% of the vote and ensure that a coalition of all anti-ANC groups can remove Zuma's two thirds majority.

On such mundane tactics are built the rocks of African constitutionalism. The key is not the holding of elections. It is a capacity to entrench enough pluralism and dissent to enable peaceful changes of government to take place, to render power permeable.
Despite appearances, South Africa has long been one of the few "third world" states to pass this test. Apartheid never stamped out a free press or political opposition. Its ruling oligarchy was sufficiently open that, when the time came, it negotiated its own dismantling. Under Nelson Mandela and Mbeki, the ANC was boorish and corrupt, but rarely dictatorial. When Mbeki lost the confidence of his party in 2008, it ruthlessly but constitutionally removed him.

South Africa's politicians can cas-tigate ministers. Judges can sentence, journalists can write, academics lecture and businessmen can trade without being shot or kidnapped. The finance minister, Trevor Manuel, is a respected figure, and the reserve bank has avoided the reckless negligence of its British counterpart. Despite a horrendous crime rate, this country is in no sense a failed state.

Thus all eyes turn to Zuma. To the sceptics he is the harbinger of Armageddon, whose slogan is "Bring me my machine gun"; he is a polygamous, leopardskin-draped, Zulu boss, an unschooled former terrorist, Communist sympathiser and rabble-rouser. Already his ANC youth movement is disrupting meetings of Cope, with blood-curdling slogans worthy of Robert Mugabe's thugs.

On this view, Zuma is just another African crony politician for whom power is not about government but about personal enrichment. When accused of corruption he blithely warns that, if convicted, he will "bring others down with me", a virtual confession of guilt. Under his sway the once formidable South African army is in disarray. Power generation is collapsing. How South Africa will host the soccer World Cup next year remains moot. The pledge of "No shacks by 2010" is mocked by the shanty towns growing to the perimeter of Cape Town airport.

Yet South Africa's capacity for putting the best face on the world is undimmed. To the purveyors of realpolitik, Zuma has a popular bonhomie absent from the aloof and ineffective Mbeki. He is one of the Robben Island alumni schooled by Mandela in the art of consensus. His courageous resolution of fierce tribal violence in KwaZulu-Natal in 1994 stands much to his credit.

Zuma may be of humble background but he is clearly no fool. His toppling of Mbeki was carefully planned. His selection of Kgalema Motlanthe as interim president was shrewd, as is his support for Manuel as finance minister. He follows his ANC predecessors in knowing that South Africa must keep the white business community aboard or it will die. His relaxed self-confidence is reassuring after the paranoia of Mbeki. His belief that there must be a "greater role for the state in regulating markets" is hardly extremist these days.

The courts may yet decide - and decide soon - to bring Zuma to trial on a catalogue of charges that promise to reopen the African antics of the British firm, BAE Systems. Someone is alleged to have passed him $500,000. It is then conceivable that Motlanthe might retain the presidency and South Africa plunge into civil strife, with Zuma's militant supporters pitted against the institutions of the constitution. Such an outcome would be a triumph for the rule of law, but possibly not for short-term peace and stability.

Since Zuma will shortly be in a position to forestall such a crisis by sacking those ranged against him, the constitution may have to wait on politics. Those dealing with South Africa must probably get used to Zuma's style of government, morally contaminated, administratively chaotic and corrupt. It is a country whose continued support for Zimbabwe, Iran, Sudan, Burma and China has betrayed Mandela's pledge for a "human rights-led foreign policy".

Yet I have visited South Africa for too long ever to write it off. It still reminds me of what America must have been like in the 19th century, the richest presence on its continent and a ceaseless magnet for political and economic migrants.

If the opposition can deprive Zuma of his two-thirds majority, South Africa could entrench just enough liberty to defy the pessimists. At the election after this one, an opposition might emerge coherent enough to do to Zuma what he did to Mbeki and Mandela did to Afrikanerdom. It could bring regime change in Africa, not through the bullet but the ballot box.

South Africa cosying up to nasty Regimes

Why post-apartheid South Africa, once a shining beacon of human rights, is cosying up to nasty regimes around the world

South Africa’s handling of the Zimbabwean crisis has drawn sharp criticism from many corners. Indeed, among the international human-rights fraternity, post-apartheid South Africa—the democratic, multicultural “rainbow nation” forged by Nelson Mandela—is once again regarded as something of a pariah. Its gentle treatment of Mr Mugabe, once justified by fear of instability on South Africa’s borders, has become part of a wider pattern of alignment with some of the world’s least savoury regimes.

In the UN Security Council, South Africa has voted against imposing sanctions not only on Zimbabwe but also on Myanmar’s military junta (after last year’s crackdown on peaceful protesters) and Iran (for violating nuclear safeguards). It is now leading efforts to suspend the International Criminal Court’s prosecution of Omar al-Bashir, Sudan’s president, for alleged genocide in Darfur.

Its record in the UN Human Rights Council is no better. It has voted to stop monitoring human rights in Uzbekistan, despite widespread torture there, and in Iran, where executions, including those of juvenile offenders, have soared. “Never in my wildest dreams did I believe South Africa would play such a negative role,” says Steve Crawshaw of Human Rights Watch, an international monitoring group.

Shortly before taking over as South Africa’s first democratically elected president in 1994, Mr Mandela vowed that “human rights will be the light that guides our foreign affairs.” After decades of isolation under an apartheid government, Africa’s richest country would return to the world stage as a “beacon of hope” for the oppressed. And it all seemed to begin so well. At home, the new government brought in one of the most progressive constitutions in the world, prohibiting every kind of discrimination and guaranteeing not only the classic civil liberties but also a right to adequate housing, reproductive health care and even to “have the environment protected”. The death penalty was abolished; the abandonment of nuclear weapons confirmed.

Abroad, South Africa launched itself as one of the region’s leading peacemakers, mediating in conflicts across Africa and sending troops into Darfur, Burundi, the Central African Republic and Congo. It was also the leading light behind the New Partnership for Africa’s Development, with an African peer-review system to promote democracy and good governance. Along with Brazil, China, India and Mexico, South Africa is now one of five emerging countries regularly invited to meetings of the G8, the group of the world’s richest states. And whenever reform of the UN Security Council comes up, its name is always among those mooted for a possible new permanent seat.

But in recent years, Mr Mandela’s promised beacon has begun to look decidedly dim. Since 2006, when South Africa secured a (non-permanent) seat on the Security Council for the first time, it has been chumming up with China, Russia and other authoritarian regimes to water down or block virtually every resolution touching on human rights. It argues that the Security Council (dominated by the five veto-wielding permanent members) should not concern itself with such issues, leaving them to the Human Rights Council (on which developing countries have a controlling majority). But that body has proved as ineffectual as its predecessor, stifling—with South Africa’s help—criticism of the world’s worst tyrants.

Why has democratic South Africa done so much to squander its once acclaimed moral leadership? In truth, the ruling African National Congress has always been cosy with some dictators, such as Libya’s Muammar Qaddafi and Cuba’s Fidel Castro, even under Mr Mandela—largely out of gratitude for past help during the struggle against white rule.

Another reason for its actions can be found in Mr Mandela’s experience in 1995, when he found little support in Africa for action against Nigeria’s former military junta. A bigger reason lies in South Africa’s ambivalent sense of identity, with one foot in the rich world, where its main economic interests continue to lie, and the other in the poor one, with which many of its people identify. Even after the end of white rule, some of South Africa’s neighbours regard it as something of a Trojan horse for the West. Hence its desire constantly to affirm its African credentials while playing down any hegemonic ambitions.

South Africa has never sought to define itself as a great force for good in the world, says Aziz Pahad, deputy foreign minister until his resignation in September. Like almost every other country, its foreign policy is based not on morality but primarily on its own national interest. And that, says Mr Pahad, lies in creating a new and more equitable world order.

Thus South Africa’s earlier talk about setting Africa’s house in order has given way to pushing for more representation of poorer countries in multilateral institutions such as the UN Security Council, the IMF and the World Bank. South Africa’s ambition to gain a greater voice means making common cause not just with its African neighbours but also with the rest of the poor world, democratic or not.

Many South Africans say that rich countries’ strictures on democracy and human rights will carry little moral force until poorer countries have a bigger say in running the affairs of the world. Not all agree. Turning a blind eye to oppression abroad is “a betrayal of our own noble past”, argues Desmond Tutu, a Nobel peace-prize winner and a hero of the struggle against white rule. “If others had used the arguments we are using today when we asked them for their support against apartheid we might still have been unfree,” he says.

Showdown in South Africa

Fred Bridgland reports from Johannesburg
Sunday Herald International

SOUTH AFRICAN democracy, born with huge hope and global goodwill when Nelson Mandela was elected state president 15 years ago, enters its fourth all-race general election next month in a fragile state.



Political commentators bewail the fact that there is no real election debate and that the campaign is proving dirty and intellectually arid. There is much head-shaking about the probability that Jacob Zuma, facing extensive graft charges, will become state president, and Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, given prison sentences for fraud and kidnapping teenager Stompie Moeketsi and beating him to within an inch of his death before he was murdered, will be one of his top lieutenants.

"Never before have so many people been so scared by the words of so few," said the satirist Pieter-Dirk Uys, who added that some of Zuma's militant supporters make former white Nazi leader Eugene Terre'blanche look like a liberal democrat.

Few political campaigners are addressing the terrifying statistic, recently highlighted by leading academic Dr Mamphela Ramphele - a former World Bank vice-president and mother of two children by murdered Black Consciousness leader Steve Biko - that 60% of South Africans aged 18 to 35 do not have jobs. What motivates them and how they will vote is the big unknown factor in the most unpredictable election since racial apartheid was buried in 1994.

"The crisis of our swelling numbers of poorly educated, unskilled and unemployed youth is central to this country's many problems," said veteran journalist Allister Sparks, former editor of the Rand Daily Mail. "It is the taproot from which other problems sprout, from crime to delinquent social behaviour and poor economic performance."

With no apprenticeship system, amid rigid labour laws that discourage employers from taking on unskilled workers, more than half a million young people leave the creaking, mismanaged education system every two years with no certificates of any kind. Many begin their adult lives by slipping into careers of petty crime before drifting into the ranks of the big criminal syndicates that have set up in South Africa because they know policing is weak and there is a big pool of desperate labour willing to do the violent hit-work.

Perhaps the only certainty in the election is that the African National Congress (ANC), the former main liberation movement, which has ruled with big majorities since 1994, will win again.

How big that majority will be (and allied to it, the future health of South Africa's still stripling democracy) is the crucial issue for ANC stalwarts, who want to see their party's rule entrenched, and for ANC opponents, who fear democracy will be undermined if the liberation movement-turned-political party is given too big a majority.

William Gumede, author of a critical biography of former president Thabo Mbeki and a professor at the University of Witwatersrand and the University of London, warned: "The problem with liberation movements is that they create liberation aristocrats who do what they want.

"This time, before and after the election, is our tipping point. From here things will go downhill. No liberation movement has moved upwards from this point. The ANC coalition is only holding because there's an election to be won."

Gumede's widely shared argument is that the ANC is an alliance formed with a single agenda - to fight and topple whites-only rule - that cannot hold long-term and is already dividing the party.

Late last year several leading lifelong ANC activists defected and formed a breakaway party they named the Congress of the People (Cope), after a giant gathering in Johannesburg 54 years ago of people from four movements opposed to apartheid rule. From the Congress of the People in 1955 emerged the Freedom Charter, characterised by its opening demand, "The People Shall Govern", which became the ANC manifesto. Nelson Mandela, then in his thirties and on the run from the security services, attended the congress disguised as a milkman.

Gumede believes that further tensions will emerge within the rump ANC. Jacob Zuma rose to power as the party's leader at the last electoral congress with the support of the ANC's long-serving trade union and South African Communist Party allies who saw in his populist ability to communicate with ordinary black people a means to entrench their views in government. Above all, they hoped that he would abandon the conservative economic policies of former President Thabo Mbeki.

But while Zuma wants to retain Trevor Manuel in the job of finance minister that he has handled deftly for the past 13 years, achieving an annual growth rate of nearly 5% and keeping the country on an even keel between high expectations and economic reality, the president-in-waiting's union and communist backers want Manuel out for pursuing policies they label "too conservative."

Zuma, when he becomes state president next month, will be in a cleft stick. Manuel is the one person left in the South African government with a high international reputation. His sacking would accelerate the drop in world confidence in South Africa's future. If he remains, Zuma's leftist backers will use him as a stick with which to beat Zuma and large parts of his support might drain away. "This is a postponed fight," said Gumede.

The splits within the ANC are perhaps the least of Zuma's problems. He will take office, assuming the ANC wins, with serious criminal charges hanging over him. In August his long-delayed trial is due to begin on 783 counts of corruption, fraud, money-laundering, racketeering and tax evasion in connection with the country's graft-ridden £5.5 billion arms deal with British Aerospace and other west European arms manufacturers.

The trial, whether it goes ahead or is abandoned as the result of a widely anticipated stitch-up, is bound to plunge the country's legal and political processes into turmoil.

"Many ANC leaders think this case will simply disappear," said Gumede. "It is not going to go away. This is a major crisis. It will suck in the ANC and it will become more and more damaging to the ANC as information emerges."

The surest way for the ANC to get Zuma off the hook would be for the party to win a two-thirds majority in the proportional representation-only election on April 22. A two-thirds majority would allow the ANC to alter the constitution and grant immunity from prosecution to a serving head of state.

However, the Cope split virtually ensures that the ANC will not be able to secure the necessary majority. Cope, led initially by former ANC defence minister Mosiuoa Lekota and Sam Shilowa, former ANC premier of Gauteng, South Africa's economically most important province, said it hoped to win 51% of the vote in its first electoral outing. The best early estimates suggest Cope will win somewhere between 8% and 15% of the national vote - not enough to fulfil its wildest dreams, but sufficient, combined with votes for other opposition parties, to deprive Zuma of a two-thirds majority.

The ANC faces another problem - the worldwide credit crisis. Its impact on South Africa was delayed, but now the country is in deep recession, with workers being laid off from the mines and the automobile industry, which supplies parts to manufacturers in other parts of the world, and bank profits dropping. With real unemployment growing beyond 40%, Zuma's main strategy boast has become a chimera: "At the core of our economic programme is to grow the economy and create more jobs at a faster rate The ANC government will lead a massive public investment programme for growth and employment creation."

Zuma will instead find he needs to deal with an economy shrinking at 2% annually, according to independent economists, and explain to the electorate and his trade union and communist partners why the campaign promises now have to go in reverse direction.

Zuma, already handicapped by his impending trial, may also be handicapped by the sensational re-emergence from the political wilderness of Winnie Madikizela-Mandela.

Madikizela-Mandela, the 71-year-old ex-wife of Nelson Mandela, is fifth on the list of ANC parliamentary candidates, virtually assuring her of a ministerial post in a Zuma cabinet should she want it. Her political career has appeared dead many times, and few gave her a chance of a comeback when she was forced to resign as an MP and as president of the ANC Women's League following a 2003 conviction for fraud.

South Africa's constitution states that a person sentenced to more than 12 months in jail without the option of a fine is barred from parliament. In the sensational case of Stompie Moeketsi, found with his throat slit on waste ground after the then Mrs Mandela oversaw him being beaten to a pulp, her long jail sentence in the 1990s was reduced inexplicably on appeal to a mere 15,000 rand then worth £3000 fine. Her jailing for fraud was reduced on appeal to a five-year suspended sentence, later reduced to three and a half years.

Opposition parties face a dilemma in deciding whether to challenge Madikizela-Mandela's eligibility. Her popularity among ANC activists was confirmed at recent elections to the ANC national executive committee, in which she came top. But her wider popularity is doubtful. It may prove politically advantageous for the ANC's opponents to see her front the ruling party's campaign alongside a leader facing serious criminal charges.

Already the ANC is acting as though there will be no legal challenge, arguing that Madikizela-Mandela never served a single day of her total sentences of 11 years' imprisonment. The party's first TV campaign advert shows Nelson Mandela in iconic footage walking free from prison in 1990, with his right hand a fist in the air and his left clasping the hand of his then wife, a vivacious 52-year-old Winnie.

The advert omits the fact that Nelson later divorced her, citing her multiple adultery, which had left him "humiliated and lonely"; her hypocritical expressions of affection for him at public gatherings; and her lavish spending. Mandela said Winnie had refused to sleep with him on his release, and added: "I was the loneliest man during the period I stayed with her. If the entire universe persuaded me to reconcile I would not."

Winnie Mandela was for a long time one of the most famous women in the world. Tall and beautiful, she was revered and honoured at home and abroad as the mother of the nation and wife of the imprisoned Mandela. She achieved the status of international political martyr when she was sent by the apartheid-era police into internal exile in a grim country town that was South Africa's equivalent of the Soviet gulags.

When she returned from internal exile she formed her notorious bodyguard, the Mandela United Football Club, which never played a match but was involved in scores of assassinations in the giant black township of Soweto. Slogans began to be painted on township walls calling her the "Mugger of the Nation".


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...